PART
FOUR
Lacrimosa
For
Ethiopia
: Medrek and the �Code of Conduct�
By Tecola W, Hagos � December 1, 2009
All
the world's a stage,
And
all the men and women merely players:
They
have their exits and their entrances;
And
one man in his time plays many parts�
William
Shakespeare - All the world's a stage (from As You Like It
2/7)
I.
Introduction
Edward I of
England
in Braveheart said in frustration, "The trouble with
Scotland
is that it's full of Scots."
I will not extend similar sentiment about
Ethiopia
and the people of
Ethiopia
; however, I can say in similar vain about the problems now facing
Ethiopia
for most part is a self generated one. With some degree of reservation, I
can say that the trouble with
Ethiopia
is that it is full of Ethiopian 'politicians'
and their followers. In some cases, we seem to be developing a habit of
being a nefarious and uncouth people when it comes to our relationships
with our leaders, for we all aspire to be leaders. It also appears to me
that we are increasingly seeking the
limelight and the fame of heroes without undergoing the sacrifice, the
pain, and the suffering leading to such success.
How many Ethiopians,
among the opposition or in general, would have the type of personal
individualized courage as some of Ethiopia�s heroes from our past, such
as Abraha Deboch, Moges Asghedom, Belai Aschenaki, Zerai Deres, Abuna
Petros et cetera? I am not
advocating here recklessness or terroristic activities, but focusing on
the mental preparedness and courage of such individuals. By contrast, I
find Ethiopian politicians in the opposition
camp in general (I
know or heard about) to be not forthcoming and secretive. However, I do
not want to be misunderstood here, for there are very heroic Ethiopians
like Judge Birtukan Mideksa and others who are facing the brutal
Government of Meles Zenawi with exemplary courage.
Indeed, we have to search deep and wide to come
up even with few names worth thinking of as heroes and leaders in present
day Ethiopian communities around the world. We are in far worse condition
than we think we are if we think most of our public figures as national
heroes and as all inclusive Ethiopian leaders. It does not take much to
debunk such wrong evaluation by simply looking how narrowly ethnic based
the leadership of some of our leading political organizations are. The
presence of a couple of supporters from other ethnic groups like in AEUP
or in the aggregation of EPRDF is just a freak albino-political situation
that should not be taken seriously, for it is no different than narrowly
constituted ethnic based organizations like the TPLF or the OLF.
Even worse we have now a new breed of unusually
uncouth and illiterate Ethiopians in cyberspace blogging and chatting all
over the Internet. They spew their venomous vulgar statements, often in
broken English and in poor balege Amharic
dictions, attacking people and each other while hiding behind false names.
Even in cyberspace, they do not have the courage to face their targets of
derision, using their own names. Such method of struggle or cowardice
should truly be embarrassing to any Ethiopian. We must seek to change such
destructive characteristics.
I expected a deluge as a response to my articles
�Lacrimosa for Ethiopia� Part One, Part Two, and Part Three
[www.tecolahagos.com] from the eternally disaffected Diaspora, and it
turned out to be a trickle, and even then most were posted in chat
stations. On the other hand, I find the level of participation and the
intensity of questioning the actions of the Code of Conduct signers both
surprising and encouraging. Moreover, the one criticism, worth mentioning
here, was delivered by Dr. Mankelkilot Haile Selassie. I have given my
proper response in Part Three of my �Lacrimosa for
Ethiopia
� series of Articles. Mankelkilot, at the very least wrote in coherent
and readable English, even though his essay was a mixed bag inundated with
ad hominem statements, factual errors, and some impertinence that a
moralist like him should have kept out from a piece that he thought is the
coup-de-grace to the �Lone Ranger� i.e. me. I wish Mankelkilot would
realize the search for truth is a lonely venture, and the Lone Ranger,
just like Zorro and Robin Hood, the symbol of justice, courage, and hope
for oppressed people!
II.
My Participation in Political Organizations
In order to clear the platform for discourse,
which is littered with misinformation and vulgarity, it is only proper to
state clearly what my political party affiliation might be. First of all
there is a misrepresentation by several individuals chatting or posting
statements in Websites that allege I am a member or adviser of Medrek.
Neither allegation is true. However,
I am a member of a civic organization that is aiming to bring together all
political and civic organizations to a forum for closer relationship.
That civic organization has two main purposes: to defend the
Sovereignty of Ethiopia and to keep the territorial integrity of
Ethiopia
intact as we inherited it from our fathers.
I supported Medrek as a viable opposition forum,
for its innovative and clearly stated goals as contained in its final
version of its Minimum Program where it laid out promising major
principles and goals as its political and social programs. I am in favor
of the Minimum Program mainly due to the fact that it did not mention even
once the divisive Article 39 of the 1995 Constitution, and also due to the
fact that the Program clearly stated that the Members of Medrek are for
unity and the preservation of the Sovereignty and territorial integrity of
Ethiopia
. These goals are goals I fully support. However, I do have my criticism
on the fact that they did not establish a clear hierarchy between
individual rights and group rights. I presume such issues would be
resolved in the process of change taking place on the ground. However, it
would have been helpful had there been some indication of the preferred
theoretical or normative base in the Medrek Program itself.
With deep regret, I report that I am not a
member of Andenet or before that I was not a member of Kinijit or of any other political organization. I do not consider
this lack of direct political connectedness as some kind of virtue.
However, it will not be fair to leave the matter at that for a number of
Ethiopians may want to hear more the reason why I am not a member of any
political organization. It is not I who shy away from membership in such
political organizations. The reason of my isolation from all political
groups is not that simple to understand. I would want to express clearly
how far disappointed I am for being a victim of what is obviously
conspiratorial decisions of exclusivity on the part of the leadership of
such political organizations. It is not because I refused to be a member
of any of the political parties, but I simply cannot force myself on any
group that deliberately shunned me.
I know most of the leaders of those political
organizations; some even are/were very close friends. For some reason that
is inexplicable and beyond my understanding none of them seem interested
to have me as their member, though they lap up my ideas and publicize my
supportive articles of their political agendas. No one else has written as
extensively on matters that concern Ethiopia or the welfare of its people,
as I have done, except for Professor Al Mariam whose proficiency and
productivity no one can mach even though he infuriates me at times on the
issue of Ethiopia�s vital interest that he failed to distinguish from
his animosity and outrage against Meles Zenawi and his Government.
A few years back, I spent a couple of years
traveling all over the
United States
,
Canada
, and
Europe
promoting the Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity of Ethiopia. I even
barged on the Boarder Committee at its formative stage three years ago
with my unsolicited advice and a series of articles condemning the
alienation of Ethiopian territory to the
Sudan
. However, when it comes to organizational participation, I was actively
brushed aside with insidious campaign by faceless and gutless individuals
within the existing Board who could not dare confront me with anything I
have done wrong to be so avoided. I had to bring into the discussion my
personal experience in order to state firmly my analysis, and not for
personal vanity.
III.
Meles Zenawi: A Superb Machiavellian
If Machiavelli were alive today and if he were to be asked who would be his
best student, I believe, he would have answered, �Meles Zenawi of
Ethiopia
!� No surprise on that; moreover, it does not require a
Stephen-Hawkins-brain to understand the choice. This is not a complement
to Meles Zenawi, but recognition of the craftiness of a formidable
individual. I admit grudgingly what Meles Zenawi did in having the Code of
Conduct signed at this particular time, on such public forum, was a
brilliant counter move to neutralize Medrek and its political agenda. In
Meles we have someone who has mastered the art of publicity and changing
the political dynamic that is not favorable to him or to his liking, with
serious public impact. Most importantly he moved the debate from focusing
on his failed leadership of oppression, corruption, and famine on to the
opportunist political party leaders, such as Hailu Shawel, Lidetu Ayalew,
and Ayele Chamiso, who were used as pawns on the political chess
board of
Ethiopia
.
I realize my criticism of Meles Zenawi and his
new partners may sound like closing the coop after the fox has escaped
with the chicken. No one should close the book as yet, for the current
political situation in
Ethiopia
is not that bad but a new opening for our struggle. Meles Zenawi and his
new partners only dug more trouble for themselves. Moreover, I need not
remind anyone that I have been criticizing Meles Zenawi for his
destructive policies as regards the economic, social, and political life
of
Ethiopia
and its people for sometime now. I have posted numerous articles on Meles
Zenawi�s failure as a progressive and visionary leader. Just as a
reminder, I have incorporated the more serious specific items on the
failed and disastrous leadership of Meles Zenawi as follows:
I
have read comments posted by Meles supporters that assert that my
criticism of Meles might be personal for being spurned by his Government.
What ever criticism I have leveled against Meles Zenawi and his Government
has never been due to any personal animosity. I have criticized Meles for
his misdeeds, for hurting
Ethiopia
and for brutalizing Ethiopians. I have criticized him for his
balkanization of
Ethiopia
. I have criticized him for ceding Ethiopian territories of Kunama, Irob,
Afar coastal territories, Ethiopian villages and vast border disputed
territories with
Sudan
et cetera. I have criticized him for compromising the Sovereignty and
Territorial Integrity of Ethiopia. I have criticized him for interfering
with the justice system and for being lawless. I have criticized him for
his crony based selective economic development policy. I have criticized
him on many more items of national concerns. Thus, I wish people will stop
trivializing my legitimate and serious effort of standing up for the best
interest of
Ethiopia
as some act of personal animosity toward Meles Zenawi or anybody else.
Meles
Zenawi has committed inexcusable crimes against the State of Ethiopia and
all Ethiopians. Starting from destruction of the education system to
destroying civility, Meles Zenawi is responsible for the insurmountable
social, political, and economic problems engulfing
Ethiopia
for the last seventeen years. He alone is the main force for the land
locking of
Ethiopia
. The detention and murder of many Ethiopians since the day EPRDF took
power is also another responsibility he will be required to account for.
Meles is the ideologue, the crusader, and the enforcer of the current
divisive ethnic federal structure of
Ethiopia
based on narrow ethnic identity. This was done in pursuit and fulfillment
of the agenda to divide and weaken
Ethiopia
, which was the main goal of the Eritrean secessionist political
organization, the EPLF.
Meles�s
state crimes are not limited to the State of Ethiopia. He has also
destroyed the TPLF and corrupted the EPRDF. The TPLF that is now claimed
to be in existence is not the TPLF that heroically fought Mengistu�s
brutal Government. Meles has transformed that political organization into
a Mafia-like private organization now. The present Meles Zenawi�s TPLF
is fully involved in criminal activities murdering people, torturing
people, looting the wealth of a nation et cetera. The recent uncovering of
gold bar heist, replacing authentic gold bars with fake gold bars at the
Ethiopian Central Bank to the tune of several hundred million dollars loss
to Ethiopia, is alleged by some to be the work of TPLF�s highly placed
officials to benefit their organization and themselves. This is the tragic
end of an organization, which had as its members some of the finest
patriotic Ethiopians I had the privilege to know, to be associated now
with international fraud.
[Extract
from Tecola W. Hagos, �PART TWO: The Ugly American: The Horsemen of the
Apocalypse: Meles Zenawi and Mohammad Al-amoudi,� March 23, 2008, www.tecolahagos.com.]
Compared
to most leaders of Ethiopian political organizations, both inside and
outside of
Ethiopia
, Meles Zenawi is a consummate political strategist. Even with his
occasional gaffs, some extremely serious like imprisoning Judge Birtukan
Mideksa and other political leaders, selling Ethiopian land to foreigners
while millions of Ethiopians are starving, et cetera he was able to turn
the table on the opposition. His most recent political tactics to destroy
Medrek I believe is planting Professor Ephraim Isaac as a Shimagle
right in the middle of Medrek�a type of ruse he had used several times
in the past, specially when his activities have the potential to evolve
into a situation that would eventually expose his soft underbelly of a
brutal little man on the international stage.
It seems that Ephraim Isaac is connecting with Professor Beyene
Petros as his first link with Medrek. What I have heard from individuals
who claim to have some reliable source of information is that Ephraim is
suggesting that he would work some compromise between the Government and
Medrek because he has good contact with Meles. Well, �beware of Greeks
bearing gifts� remember the fate of Troy; and in case of Ephraim,
Birtukan Mideksa and how unwilling Ephraim had been even to explain
exactly what he did during the negotiation to have the Kinijit leaders
freed a few years back.
One
mistake that is repeatedly committed by opposition politicians is
undermining the abilities and survival instinct of Meles Zenawi. It is not
without wits and unflinching determination that he survived so far in a
pit of vipers, the TPLF. The annals of very many battles in the world seem
to confirm the fact that most battles were lost by those who undermine the
valor and courage and wits of their enemies.
IV.
Is Medrek Stinging or a Dud?
Until a couple of days ago, on the surface it seemed that Medrek had lost a
golden opportunity to position itself for serious discussion and
negotiation with the Government of Meles on election procedures. The
analysis of the situation in a recent article by Genet Mersha �Election
2010: Who Would Win�Politics or the People?�
[www.tecolahagos.com, November 17, 2009] is
focused in pointing out that Medrek lost a stellar opportunity to put
Meles on the defensive. Professor Messay Kebede, who is generally
positively disposed toward Medrek, wrote an article more or less cynical
in its import. [See Messay Kebede, �Much
Ado about Nothing� November 20, 2009.
www.tecolahagos.com]
For Messay what
ever we do will not amount for much for the ultimate and absolute control
of power is in the hands of Meles Zenawi. Thus, he saw no point in
criticizing Hailu Shawel. But the problem with that type of argument is
that it prejudges the capacity of people and also it is equally valid to
criticize Hailu Shawel since all such discourse in Ethiopia terminate at
the bidding and hands of Meles Zenawi. Such position also suffers from
serious logical invalidity for it is either tautological or nonsensical.
These are the types of sentiments that should be very carefully analyzed.
The recent announcement at Ghion Hotel, Addis
Ababa (November 25, 2009) that the Former President of Ethiopia, Dr.
Negasso Gidada, and the former Minister of Defense, Seeye Abraha are
joining Andnet Party is a positive and balancing politically savvy move. I
welcome the news, for it lowered my anxiety that
Ethiopia
would suffer into perpetuity not only the brutal oppressive iron hammer of
Meles Zenawi but also the added continuation of exploitation and
manipulation of the Mahel Sefari
Hailu Shawel. However, my earlier hope was to some extent tarnished by
recent development where it is reported in several news media that a
General Assembly called by Andnet
for November 29, 2009 was disrupted by individuals led by Professor Mesfin
Woldemariam. Mesfin is creating havoc in that organization due to his
allegation that certain internal procedures were violated by the
leadership in associating with Medrek and now the admission of Dr. Negaso
Gidada and ex-Minister of Defense Seeye Abraha. The activities of Mesfin
could only undermine the only true opposition to the Government of Meles
Zenwi. It serves no positive purpose to continue this form of public
protest disruption of meetings by Mesfin and supporters. I
demand that he stop.
Medrek is truly multi-ethnic political
organization, where concerned Ethiopians met on a horizontal platform
where they looked at each other face to face at eye level and tried to
solve our national problems as equal partners. Whereas the relationship
now consummated on the bed called Code of Conduct, the parties are in
vertical hierarchical relationships, whereby Meles Zenawi is at the top
then the rest in descending order. This
new group constituted by a command is not a good model for us. It is a
continuation of the abusive, brutal, and violent governmental relationship
Ethiopians had to suffer over thirty years since the demise of Emperor
Haile Selassie.
As I stated above, I have read carefully the
Minimum Program of Medrek, which is more than adequate to start the
process of change in
Ethiopia
. I am a unitary state of
Ethiopia
supporter, and I believe the Kilil
system is a divisive and destructive structure. Soon Ethiopians who are
growing up during the life of the current system will be adults. And as
adults, they would have lived a life of isolation and localized history
without many interactions with Ethiopians from other Kilils.
Here is then the tragedy, they will have nothing in common, and with guns
and ambition there is nothing that will hold them together for they will
end up fighting each other for their locality and limited resources. By
then Meles and most of the leadership that brought about such a disaster
would have died out, due to nature taking its own course, and living
Ethiopia
a tattered place with several mini states fighting each other. Who
benefits from such situation?
Foremost, those who would benefit the most when
Ethiopia
continued in chaotic state are the children and relations of Meles Zenawi
and Azeb Mesfin with their extended families and close associates. They
would then be living the high life on looted wealth from
Ethiopia
worth hundreds of millions of dollars and Euros that no one would contest
due to the ensuing chaos. The other beneficiaries are going to be
Egypt
, with unhindered access to all the waters of the Blue Nile, and
Sudan
lording it on all the land already ceded to it by Meles Zenawi. The other
predator is going to be
Somalia
, for it would have by then occupied most of the Ogaden.
Eritrea
would have claimed all of what it had claimed and some more in Afar
probably adding all of Afar all the way to Yifat.
Of late, I read in blogs that I am no more the
�intellectual power-house of Medrek� or the �friend of Seeye� or
of �Gebru Asrat,� but a �soldier� of Seeye Abraha and Gebru Asrat.
At my age and taking into account the fact that I am a product of a decent
legitimate Church sanctioned marriage of two great families from Tigray
and Wollo/Shoa, families of great heroes and warriors not to mention of
great scholars that served Ethiopia for generations, including in the
heroic Patriotic resistance during the five years occupation of Ethiopia,
I can accept no less titles than �Field
Marshal� or �General� or �Head of State� or �Prime
Minister.� On a second
thought, I have a far better idea, why not �Emperor� of
Ethiopia
? After all when I take into account the types of leaders we had crowned
as �Emperors� or �Presidents� or �Prime Ministers,� or
�Commanders� of our forces in the last century and a half, individuals
that were either �ye bet woladge bastards�
or �street brawler ignorant brutal savage Mahel
Sefaris� or �sons of turn-coat bandas,�
I find myself far more superbly qualified to be crowned �Emperor� more
than any of our past leaders. There you have it, let me see if you would
chock on it or throw a tantrum foaming from your mouth!
V.
The �Code of Conduct�
There is nothing especial about the document referred to as the �Code of
Conduct� signed by Meles Zenawi on behalf of the Government and EPRDF
(It is not clear which hat he is wearing) and Hailu Shawel, Lidetu Ayalew,
and Ayele Chamiso
on the other. The basic document that was the basis for the Code of
Conduct was a draft model prepared by the Institute for Democracy and
Electoral Assistance (IDEA) group. The
IDEA group is an intergovernmental organization formed in 1995 pursuant to
a conference held in
Stockholm
,
Sweden
, by fourteen Governmental representatives. Currently, it has twenty eight
States as its members, and has an Observer Status at the United Nations.
The Members of its Board of Directors are drawn from former government
officials of Member States.
Ethiopia
is not a Member. The purpose of the organization as stated in its basic
document is as follows: �International IDEA�s mission is to support
sustainable democratic change by providing comparative knowledge, and
assisting in democratic reform, and influencing policies and politics.�
It is financed mainly by the governments of the Member States.
When
using a �Model� legislations or codes of any kind drafted by
think-thank organizations such as IDEA, there is the risk of irrelevance
or oversimplification. The Ethiopian version of the Code of Conduct is not
relevant and it also glosses over serious problems. It moralizes, when it
should be regulating conduct with a non-political enforcement system. The
problem in
Ethiopia
is that there is no independent judiciary, no independent Electoral Board,
and the Police is simply an extension of the military forces commanded by
Meles Zenawi and his group of supporters. By contrast the Georgian
political parties that signed the National Democratic Institute�s (NDI)
Code of Conduct fully recognized and anticipated the role to be played by
international observers in addition to Party sponsored observers at their
polling stations during elections. The Ethiopian version of the Code of
Conduct does not anticipate nor make any reference to international
observers. There in lies its serious defect, and lends to the validity of
the accusation that the whole thing is just a smoke-screen. This Ethiopian
Code of Conduct is a dud, a toothless contraption.
Another
serious problem with the Code of Conduct is that it created another
bureaucratic layer made up of the four political organizations (that
signed the Code of Conduct) to act as a kind of first line of defense or a
clearing-house before any other political organization could touch the
Ethiopian Government functionaries. In other words, Meles Zenawi has
created another ring around him to defend his position by the very people
that were supposed to challenge him. I think Sun Tzu would have been proud
of such brilliant military strategy turning ones enemies to be one�s
defenders! At any rate, it
pits political organizations against each other, creating disharmony and
chaos in all opposition groups in
Ethiopia
. How is it possible to serve the national interest of
Ethiopia
as a State if its constituent parts are feuding all over the place?
Already tremendous tension and confusion has been the consequence of the
public signing of the Code of Conduct.
VI.
Conclusion: What is to be done?
The recurrent famine in
Ethiopia
affects no less than twenty million people every year for almost two
decades. No less than ten million Ethiopians are under permanent food care
by the international community of donors year to year for all of the life
of the EPRDF run Ethiopian Government. In short,
Ethiopia
is in dire circumstance, and the record of the Government of Meles Zenawi
is not what the West is projecting as that of phenomenal positive growth.
Yes, there are some major infrastructure works that will still be of
benefit to the people of
Ethiopia
long after Meles and his nightmarish Government and close associates are
gone for good. Major public works constructions, such as the Tekeze Dam,
the Gilgel Gibe Dams, the many airports, buildings around the country,
roads, et cetera, no matter how they were financed and built, would be of
service to the people of
Ethiopia
for a long time.
I have in mind a series of fundamental changes
that need be implemented to change the cycle of famine and the general
degradation of human life in Ethiopia, and it starts by supporting Medrek
as an alternative to that of the new coalition formed in the guise of
signing of a �Code of Conduct� between Meles Zenawi and so called
opposition parties. Medrek would be developed further into a viable true
opposition to bring about fundamental changes and turn
Ethiopia
from heading straight in to political abyss. In order to achieve such
goals Medrek must expand its reach and bring into its fold all Ethiopians
from all backgrounds as long as they are willing to serve
Ethiopia
and the People of Ethiopia.
Hate politics must be left behind once and for
all. Instead, Medrek must play the galvanizing role for unity, solidarity,
and humanistic approach to solve our many problems through peaceful means.
This goes even to opening its arms to those who are currently supportive
of Meles Zenawi and Members of the EPRDF or any of the affiliate
organizations to join and work together to save our
Ethiopia
. We should not think of any of us as enemies, but as possible friends for
tomorrow. If possible we must even work to reverse the decisions of
misguided political groups who are standing in line to work with Meles
Zenawi. Politics is the art of the possible, and such possibility in
Medrek is open ended and helpful to
Ethiopia
�s political and economic development.
Allowing criticism and tolerating dissention is
a sign of strength and not of weakness. Thus, I level my criticism of
Medrek leaders for making one very serious mistake. In my views, they
almost forfeited their leadership right. They should all consider
reassessing their actions of the last couple of months and ought to
consider advancing new breed of leaders. Their misjudgment in that they
would try to negotiate on one-to-one basis with the Government of Meles
Zenawi while shunning the other political organizations was a serious
error of judgment that would be very difficult to mend. Such error should
never be repeated. This is not the place or time to seek vengeance or
settle old scores. It is simply unacceptable to disfranchise any political
organization at a point when one ought to show unity and solidarity with
everyone.
To me the fact of the signing of the Code of
Conduct to join Meles Zenawi and his political group is more of a reaction
to the degree of that poor political judgment on the part of Medrek. I
learned some very important lessons from those mistakes of the leaders of
Medrek. So far it seems to me that Medrek Members kept their political
organizations to themselves thereby affecting the over all support level
of Ethiopians both locally and internationally. I have not seen much of a
drive in the direction of recruiting new members here, for example, in
Washington
DC
where I reside. I must emphasize the fact that the Members of Medrek have
sacrificed much and have faced off with tremendous courage the most
oppressive regime in the World. Thus, all of my criticism is done without
malice and in full support of Medrek and its leaders.
The first order of business for Medrek is to
focus on expanding membership in each of the constitutive political
organizations. There should be an active campaign to add new members and
supporters also in the Diaspora. No political organization would be
effective in
Ethiopia
without the support of large number of actively recruited members. I am
writing from my own experience of the fact that no one had actively sought
to have me as a member or supporter of his or her political organization
except one because of personal knowledge of my uncompromising commitment
to the cause of
Ethiopia
. I was available to all, and expressed my support openly in numerous
articles. I also made my Website available for posting important press
releases from such political organizations. At any rate, Medrek is the
future of
Ethiopia
, it has all the right elements to evolve as a multi ethnic party into the
ultimate unitary Ethiopian major political party.
It may be too early to write a requiem or an
elegy on
Ethiopia
, for this ancient nation seems to have more than �nine lives� at any
critical point in its long and fabulous history. It might even be
premature to feel anguish and write a Lacrimosa
either. The vitality and the spirit of greatness of Ethiopians is
asserted, to those whose eyes are open to see, every other week in a most
dramatic fashion by Ethiopia�s World record holders and ever increasing
champions�the greatest athletes the world has ever seen�and all that
happening during a time of political corruption, an invading famine,
political turmoil, betrayal by leaders, the looting of our national
wealth, and the ceding and alienation of our territories and farm lands.
We are one great people! We have a wonderful land of untapped wealth, and
great fabulous history. We all must fight for
Ethiopia
and for each other. No Ethiopian should lose hope and give up on
Ethiopia
!
Tecola
W. Hagos
December
1, 2009
Notice
to Visitors of www.tecolahagos.com:
I will maintain �Lacrimosa For Ethiopia� as a series name for future
articles dealing with the economy and political life of
Ethiopia
. TH
|